Who is the Real King of the Ring in Super Smash Bros. 2? (Spoiler: It’s Complicated)
You are curious about a long-standing debate. “Who’s the best character in Super Smash Bros. 2?” Hold on a second. This question is hard. It’s like arguing over the finest ice cream flavor. Pinpointing one character as “best” leads to endless discussions and sometimes controller-throwing.
When you mention Super Smash Bros. 2, I assume you refer to the original on Nintendo 64. The sequel was Super Smash Bros. Melee, but we know what you mean. Back then, the game was simpler. Or maybe less polished. Balance in fighting games lacked seriousness. It was more a suggestion.
There isn’t a universally accepted “best” character in the original Super Smash Bros. You find characters that players consider strong or versatile. Others are just annoying. Think of it as a chaotic playground ranking rather than a straightforward list.
In Super Smash Bros. discussions, the notion of the “best” character often appears. This theme runs through every game update. From quiet talks in hallways about who’s “broken” in Melee to online debates about tier rankings in Ultimate, the quest for digital supremacy never ends.
The search for the best character goes beyond the N64 period. It extends through the Super Smash Bros. franchise. It spills into the world of fighting games. Players continuously debate who’s at the top, whether in Ultimate or classic games like Super Street Fighter 2 Turbo. Even debates between universes arise, like “Could Goku defeat Luffy?”
About Super Smash Bros. Ultimate, the latest game has a huge roster. The debates about powerful characters become more nuanced. For example, Sephiroth can deal massive damage, as Game Rant highlights. That One-Winged Angel isn’t just for looks; he can end stocks quickly.
However, there are weaker characters as well. CBR offered a list of the least powerful characters in Super Smash Bros. Ultimate. “Weakest” is subjective. In skilled hands, even low-tier characters can win battles. But this shows an imbalance in such a wide roster.
Returning to the original Super Smash Bros. on N64, tier lists weren’t as detailed. Some characters were known for their strength. Pikachu had speed and recovery skills that made him dangerous. Kirby’s copy abilities and floatiness posed challenges. Fox could dominate with fast lasers and shine moves.
Don’t forget the human factor here. No matter how great a character seems on paper, the player behind the controller matters most. A master of Pikachu will likely defeat a novice Fox player, even if Fox is theoretically stronger. Skill, knowledge of matchups, and adaptability are vital for success.
The search for the “best” character connects to competitive Smash Bros., especially in Melee. The concept of the “Five Gods” emerged here. This group dominated the Melee scene, showing incredible skill and creativity, as Liquipedia Smash Wiki explains. These players, often linked to specific characters, became icons and intensified debates around character potential.
Returning to your question about the “best” character in Super Smash Bros. 2, the answer isn’t simple. It varies across a spectrum. Some characters are stronger or easier to master. Others reward player commitment. The beauty of Super Smash Bros. lies in its diversity, allowing creativity and upsets.
Instead of chasing after the ideal “best” character, focus on finding one you enjoy. Master that character to unlock your potential. That goal offers true satisfaction, right?
