What Is EngineOwning 4 and How Does It Function?
EngineOwning Overview
EngineOwning is a cheat provider that offers a wide range of cheats for shooters, including Call of Duty, Counter-Strike 2, Battlefield, and more. It has been one of the main issues in the shooter community, as cheaters pose significant challenges to fair play.
Functionality and Features of EngineOwning 4
- Aimbots: Aimbots automatically aim weapons at opponents, ensuring precise shots and increased accuracy.
- Wallhacks: Allow players to see through walls, giving a strategic advantage.
- ESP Feature: The EngineOwning ESP shows players and their equipment through walls. You decide what type, what team, what distance, and what details to show.
- Anti-Cheat Bypass: With this feature, EngineOwning ensures that players can use their cheats without the risk of being detected and banned.
This functionality helps players dominate in various games:
- Our cheat for Black Ops 6, with full support for all modes, including Multiplayer, Zombie Mode, and Warzone.
- Modern Warfare III cheat aids in dominating opponents.
- Our cheat for Modern Warfare II assists you in every situation.
- Notorious full-feature cheat for Modern Warfare 2019.
- Vanguard cheat helps you dominate the second World War.
- Battlefield series cheat offers humanized aimbot and vision through walls.
- Accurate Titanfall 2 Aimbot ensures you never miss an enemy.
- Black Ops 3 cheat provides options for both legit and rage gameplay.
Legal Actions Against EngineOwning
Activision has taken legal action against EngineOwning, resulting in a judgment that requires the cheat provider to pay over $14.5 million in damages and legal fees followed by their conduct related to cheating software downloads. The lawsuit, filed in a California district court in January 2022, highlights the growing concern over cheating in video games.
This lawsuit could potentially change the landscape of the war against cheat providers in the gaming industry. The court found the request for damages reasonable under the DMCA, considering EngineOwning’s willful conduct. As part of the judgment, it was ordered that the EngineOwning domain must be transferred to Activision, reflecting the serious consequences of the cheat provider’s actions.
The lawsuit and its outcome serve as a strong message to other potential cheat providers, signaling a more aggressive approach by game developers to protect the integrity of their games.
Is EngineOwning Safe: A Deep Dive into Risks and Legitimacy
Trust and Safety Review of EngineOwning
We analyzed the website and came up with a review of engineowning.to with a trust score of 66%. This score is attributed to websites that present a medium to low risk. Our assessment involved crawling the web for information to automatically determine this rating. Moreover, we looked at various factors, including:
- Where the website is hosted
- Where the domain was registered
- The technologies used
- 37 other relevant facts
Additionally, this website has been reviewed mainly positively, as it possesses a valid SSL certificate and is considered safe by Maltiverse.
However, there are some concerns. Reports indicate that this website sells fakes, and it has been voted to be a scam on Scamadviser.
In analyzing engineowning.com, we find it likely to be a safe website based on all the risk factors and data analyzed in this in-depth review. The Scam Detector website gives engineowning.com a medium-risk trust score of 64.1. This suggests that the business is best defined by the following tags: Known, Vetted, Low Risk. Nevertheless, we recommend staying vigilant and using common sense when engaging with this website.
While the algorithm detected a slightly lower risk for activities related to phishing, spamming, and other factors, the application scores need attention. A high Malware score implies the presence of suspicious code that might be disseminated unknowingly. Additionally, a high Spam score suggests a potentially spam-ridden email address associated with the business. Scores under 30 in both categories are reassuring, but any score surpassing this threshold should raise concerns.
Online reviews reveal mixed experiences with engineowning.com. Users mention that while the cheats are effective and well-designed, many report being shadowbanned or facing account bans soon after use. Some users express satisfaction with features and customization options but caution others about the risks of being reported and the possibility of getting banned.
Overall, the scores for engineowning.to are consistent, yet they fall in the medium-risk category. Scores below 30 in critical categories raise some concerns, so caution is advised if you’re considering engaging with the site.
EngineOwning has received both positive and negative feedback, like many other websites. It is essential to exercise caution if you decide to use it. Additionally, you should thoroughly examine the Company Details section, which includes:
Conclusion:
- EngineOwning has mixed reviews regarding legitimacy and safety.
- While some sources consider it not a scam and legit, others give it a low trust score.
- It is recommended to exercise caution when using this platform.
- Engineowning.com is probably not a scam but rather legit, receiving a trust score of 65%.
The Impact of EngineOwning Lawsuits on Online Gaming Communities
Activision filed a lawsuit in the United States against German companies EngineOwning UG and CMN Holdings S.A., several named defendants, and 50 ‘John Does’.
Activision claimed that the Call of Duty cheats sold by the defendants are copyright-infringing ‘circumvention devices’ and that trafficking in them is illegal under the DMCA. Furthermore, the gaming company alleged that selling the cheats to Activision customers constitutes contract interference and that selling cheats into the market amounts to unfair competition.
On the other hand, EngineOwning UG and ten named defendants describe Activision Blizzard as a $50 billion dollar company with offices around the world, including three in Germany. They note that ten of the defendants are German citizens living in Germany; yet, Activision chose to sue them in California for alleged conduct occurring entirely abroad, mostly in Germany. Additionally, the defendants reveal that Activision is already suing two of them in Germany, in a lawsuit filed at least a year before Activision’s United States lawsuit.
The motion claims that Activision’s allegations tend to be general in nature while targeting ‘unspecified defendants’. This extremely vague form of pleading makes it impossible to identify who did what, where, and when. Instead, the plaintiff leaves it to each defendant and the court to guess.
Overall, the ongoing activities damage Activision’s games, its overall business, and the experience of the COD player community. When players use exploits like the Cheating Software, such conduct disturbs game balance and often leads non-cheating players to quit matches in frustration. Moreover, widespread cheating can lead to negative social media posts and headlines in the press, which can adversely impact consumer confidence.
The defendants have violated Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”), 17 U.S.C. § 1201(b)(1), by selling, importing, offering, providing, and otherwise trafficking in technologies that circumvent or evade anti-cheat technologies used by Activision to protect the integrity of the COD Games. They not only know that their conduct is unlawful, but they engage in it with the deliberate intent to harm Activision, its businesses, and its player community.
Activision has, and continues to invest enormous resources to combat cheating in its games. This lawsuit seeks to halt the unlawful conduct of an organization distributing and selling numerous malicious software products designed to enable the public to gain unfair competitive advantages.
As a result, the use of cheats from platforms like EngineOwning has led to frustration among honest players, many of whom leave games or lose interest, highlighting the negative impact on gaming communities. This lawsuit by Activision against EngineOwning seeks to address these issues and restore fairness in gaming.
Ultimately, Activision has secured a significant legal victory against EngineOwning, the cheat vendor. A federal court awarded $14.4 million in damages. This judgment marks a critical step in combating cheating in online gaming, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of gaming communities.
